Skip to main content

Threat T12

Agent Communication Poisoning

Injection of malicious data into inter-agent communication channels or using external systems for side channel communications and memory persistence.

  • 6/10 risk (High)
  • 6 attack vectors
  • 6 mitigating controls
  • 12 framework refs

Open in Threat ModelerAll threats

Overview

  • Impact level: Medium
  • Risk score: 6/10 (High)
  • CIA impact: Confidentiality, Integrity
  • Affected components: Agent Orchestration (KC2.1-KC2.5); Memory Modules (KC4.1-KC4.6); External Environment Interface (KC6.1-KC6.3)
  • Tags: communication, poisoning, channels, encryption, protocols
  • Source: OWASP Agentic AI T&M v1.1 (2025-12)

Attack vectors

How attackers carry out agent communication poisoning against an agentic system.

Attack vectorSeverityExample
Message InjectionMediumInjecting malicious messages into inter-agent communication
Protocol ManipulationMediumExploiting communication protocol vulnerabilities
Side Channel Data LeakageHighUsing covert channels to exfiltrate information
Communication EavesdroppingMediumIntercepting sensitive inter-agent communications
Feedback Loop PoisoningMediumCorrupting agent feedback mechanisms
Broadcast Storm AttacksMediumOverwhelming communication channels with messages

Affected components

KC2 Orchestration (Control Flow)

KC4 Memory Modules

KC6 Operational Environment (Agencies)

Mitigating controls

Controls from the catalog that reduce the likelihood or impact of T12.

  • M1 Memory Validation & Sanitization

    Implement comprehensive validation and sanitization of AI memory systems, including vector databases, embeddings, and training data to prevent poisoning attacks and ensure data integrity throughout the AI lifecycle.

  • M3 Secure Inter-Agent Communication

    Implement cryptographically secure communication channels between agents with authentication, integrity verification, replay protection, and support for decentralized identity to prevent spoofing, poisoning attacks, and rogue agent infiltration.

  • M10 Defense-in-Depth Architecture & Trust Boundaries

    Implement multiple security layers with clear trust boundaries, network segmentation, cryptographic verification, and zero-trust networking to contain breaches, prevent lateral movement, and protect against privilege compromise, identity spoofing, and rogue agents.

  • M13 Secure Development Lifecycle Integration

    Embed security practices throughout the AI and agent lifecycle with security design reviews, automated testing gates, dependency scanning, and continuous compliance checks.

  • M15 Agent Identity & Authentication Framework

    Implement comprehensive agent identity management with decentralized identifiers, verifiable credentials, and strong authentication to prevent identity spoofing, enable secure agent discovery, and support agent reputation systems.

  • M19 MCP Server Hardening & Tool Provenance

    Treat every MCP server, A2A peer and tool definition as an untrusted, versioned dependency: admit only allow-listed and verified servers, authenticate and authorize every protocol request, validate and screen tool metadata and results before they reach the model, and require re-approval when a tool definition changes.

Framework mappings

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications

Cisco AI Security Taxonomy

OWASP AIVSS core risks

OWASP AISVS

Chapters cited by the mitigating controls: C1 Training Data Integrity & Traceability, C2 Input Validation, C3 Model Lifecycle Management & Change Control, C4 Infrastructure, Configuration & Deployment Security, C5 Access Control & Identity for AI Components & Users, C6 Supply Chain Security for Models, C8 Memory, Embeddings & Vector Database Security, C9 Orchestration & Agentic Security, C10 Model Context Protocol (MCP) Security, C12 Monitoring, Logging & Anomaly Detection.

Requirements: C8.1.3, C8.2.1, C8.2.2, C8.2.3, C8.2.4, C8.2.5, C8.3.1, C8.3.2, C8.3.3, C1.1.3, C1.1.4, C1.3.1, C2.1.3, C2.1.4, C12.5.4, C9.4.1, C9.4.2, C9.5.5, C9.5.7, C10.3.1, C10.3.5, C10.4.6, C5.1.2, C9.3.5, C9.3.6, C9.5.3, C5.2.5, C5.3.1, C4.1.1, C10.1.3, C3.1.1, C3.3.1, C3.4.1, C3.4.2, C6.1.4, C9.4.3, C10.2.1, C10.2.2, C10.2.7, C10.1.1, C10.1.2, C10.2.4, C10.2.5, C10.3.3, C10.4.1, C10.4.2, C10.4.7, C10.4.8, C9.3.7, C6.1.2, C6.1.3.

MITRE ATLAS

Attack walkthroughs

References

Source: OWASP Agentic AI – Threats and Mitigations 1.1 (Dec 2025) · retrieved 2026-11