Skip to main content

Threat T15

Human Manipulation

Models exploit human trust to manipulate users, leveraging reasoning capabilities or operational access to influence human decisions.

  • 8/10 risk (Critical)
  • 6 attack vectors
  • 5 mitigating controls
  • 8 framework refs

Open in Threat ModelerAll threats

Overview

  • Impact level: High
  • Risk score: 8/10 (Critical)
  • CIA impact: Integrity
  • Affected components: Foundation Model (KC1.1-KC1.3); Reasoning Engine (KC3.1-KC3.4); External Environment Interface (KC6.1-KC6.3)
  • Tags: manipulation, trust, psychology, influence, ethics
  • Source: OWASP Agentic AI T&M v1.1 (2025-12)

Attack vectors

How attackers carry out human manipulation against an agentic system.

Attack vectorSeverityExample
Psychological ManipulationHighUsing persuasion techniques to influence human behavior
Trust ExploitationHighAbusing human trust in AI systems for malicious purposes
Emotional ManipulationMediumExploiting human emotions to achieve compliance
Information ManipulationHighPresenting biased or false information to influence decisions
Authority MimicryMediumMimicking authoritative figures to gain compliance
Cognitive Bias ExploitationMediumLeveraging human cognitive biases for manipulation

Affected components

KC1 Language Models (LLMs)

KC3 Reasoning / Planning Paradigm

KC6 Operational Environment (Agencies)

Mitigating controls

Controls from the catalog that reduce the likelihood or impact of T15.

  • M4 Prompt Hardening & Jailbreak Prevention

    Implement multiple layers of prompt security including structural defenses, behavioral constraints, runtime detection, and advanced techniques to prevent prompt injection, model manipulation, and jailbreaking attempts.

  • M8 Adaptive Human-in-the-Loop Controls

    Implement intelligent human oversight with risk-based approval workflows, clear decision interfaces, anti-fatigue mechanisms, and adaptive trust systems to prevent approval overwhelm, human attacks, and manipulation while maintaining effective oversight.

  • M11 Content Security & Output Filtering

    Implement comprehensive filtering and validation of agent outputs to prevent harmful content generation, data leakage, manipulation attempts, and ensure compliance with security policies and regulatory requirements.

  • M13 Secure Development Lifecycle Integration

    Embed security practices throughout the AI and agent lifecycle with security design reviews, automated testing gates, dependency scanning, and continuous compliance checks.

  • M16 Behavioral Monitoring & Ethics Framework

    Implement comprehensive behavioral analysis, ethics enforcement, and bias detection to identify misaligned behaviors, prevent human manipulation, and ensure ethical agent operations while maintaining transparency and accountability.

Framework mappings

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications

Cisco AI Security Taxonomy

OWASP AIVSS core risks

OWASP AISVS

Chapters cited by the mitigating controls: C1 Training Data Integrity & Traceability, C2 Input Validation, C3 Model Lifecycle Management & Change Control, C4 Infrastructure, Configuration & Deployment Security, C5 Access Control & Identity for AI Components & Users, C6 Supply Chain Security for Models, C7 Model Behavior, Output Control & Safety Assurance, C9 Orchestration & Agentic Security, C11 Adversarial Robustness, C12 Monitoring, Logging & Anomaly Detection.

Requirements: C2.1.1, C2.1.2, C2.1.3, C2.1.6, C2.1.7, C2.1.8, C11.1.3, C12.2.1, C12.2.3, C9.2.1, C9.2.2, C9.2.3, C9.2.4, C9.2.8, C9.2.10, C9.6.2, C12.4.2, C7.1.1, C7.1.2, C7.3.1, C7.3.2, C7.3.3, C7.3.4, C2.2.1, C5.2.4, C11.2.1, C3.1.1, C3.3.1, C3.4.1, C3.4.2, C4.1.1, C6.1.4, C1.3.3, C11.1.1, C11.1.5, C12.2.2, C12.3.4.

MITRE ATLAS

Attack walkthroughs

References

Source: OWASP Agentic AI – Threats and Mitigations 1.1 (Dec 2025) · retrieved 2026-11