Skip to main content

Threat T6

Intent Breaking & Goal Manipulation

Attacks that manipulate the agent's core decision-making to achieve unauthorized goals, breaking control flow, abusing shared context, or interfering with isolated data.

  • 8/10 risk (Critical)
  • 6 attack vectors
  • 6 mitigating controls
  • 7 framework refs

Open in Threat ModelerAll threats

Overview

  • Impact level: High
  • Risk score: 8/10 (Critical)
  • CIA impact: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability
  • Affected components: Foundation Model (KC1.1-KC1.3); Agent Orchestration (KC2.1-KC2.5); Reasoning Engine (KC3.1-KC3.4); Memory Modules (KC4.1-KC4.6); Tool Integration Layer (KC5.1-KC5.4)
  • Tags: intent, goals, manipulation, control-flow, semantic
  • Source: OWASP Agentic AI T&M v1.1 (2025-12)

Attack vectors

How attackers carry out intent breaking & goal manipulation against an agentic system.

Attack vectorSeverityExample
Goal SubstitutionHighReplacing agent's primary objectives with malicious goals
Intent Parser OverflowMediumOverwhelming intent extraction with complex nested requests
Semantic Ambiguity ExploitationHighCrafting instructions with multiple interpretations
Priority InversionMediumManipulating task priorities to execute unauthorized actions first
Control Flow HijackingHighRedirecting agent execution to unintended code paths
Context Window PoisoningMediumInjecting malicious context to influence decision-making

Affected components

KC1 Language Models (LLMs)

KC2 Orchestration (Control Flow)

KC3 Reasoning / Planning Paradigm

KC4 Memory Modules

KC5 Tool Integration Frameworks

Mitigating controls

Controls from the catalog that reduce the likelihood or impact of T6.

  • M4 Prompt Hardening & Jailbreak Prevention

    Implement multiple layers of prompt security including structural defenses, behavioral constraints, runtime detection, and advanced techniques to prevent prompt injection, model manipulation, and jailbreaking attempts.

  • M5 Multi-Stage Reasoning Validation

    Implement comprehensive validation of agent reasoning processes using multiple checkpoints, external validators, consistency checks, and fact verification to ensure goal alignment, prevent manipulation, and detect hallucinations.

  • M8 Adaptive Human-in-the-Loop Controls

    Implement intelligent human oversight with risk-based approval workflows, clear decision interfaces, anti-fatigue mechanisms, and adaptive trust systems to prevent approval overwhelm, human attacks, and manipulation while maintaining effective oversight.

  • M11 Content Security & Output Filtering

    Implement comprehensive filtering and validation of agent outputs to prevent harmful content generation, data leakage, manipulation attempts, and ensure compliance with security policies and regulatory requirements.

  • M13 Secure Development Lifecycle Integration

    Embed security practices throughout the AI and agent lifecycle with security design reviews, automated testing gates, dependency scanning, and continuous compliance checks.

  • M16 Behavioral Monitoring & Ethics Framework

    Implement comprehensive behavioral analysis, ethics enforcement, and bias detection to identify misaligned behaviors, prevent human manipulation, and ensure ethical agent operations while maintaining transparency and accountability.

Framework mappings

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications

Cisco AI Security Taxonomy

OWASP AIVSS core risks

OWASP AISVS

Chapters cited by the mitigating controls: C1 Training Data Integrity & Traceability, C2 Input Validation, C3 Model Lifecycle Management & Change Control, C4 Infrastructure, Configuration & Deployment Security, C5 Access Control & Identity for AI Components & Users, C6 Supply Chain Security for Models, C7 Model Behavior, Output Control & Safety Assurance, C9 Orchestration & Agentic Security, C11 Adversarial Robustness, C12 Monitoring, Logging & Anomaly Detection.

Requirements: C2.1.1, C2.1.2, C2.1.3, C2.1.6, C2.1.7, C2.1.8, C11.1.3, C12.2.1, C12.2.3, C7.1.3, C7.2.1, C7.2.2, C7.2.3, C7.4.3, C9.2.6, C9.2.7, C9.2.1, C9.2.2, C9.2.3, C9.2.4, C9.2.8, C9.2.10, C9.6.2, C12.4.2, C7.1.1, C7.1.2, C7.3.1, C7.3.2, C7.3.3, C7.3.4, C2.2.1, C5.2.4, C11.2.1, C3.1.1, C3.3.1, C3.4.1, C3.4.2, C4.1.1, C6.1.4, C1.3.3, C11.1.1, C11.1.5, C12.2.2, C12.3.4.

MITRE ATLAS

Attack walkthroughs

References

Source: OWASP Agentic AI – Threats and Mitigations 1.1 (Dec 2025) · retrieved 2026-11